Same with the short term PL2 power limit. Reduce this long term limit to what your cooling can handle. If your laptop cannot handle cooling a 60W CPU then it does not make any sense to set the long term turbo power limit (PL1) to 60W.
Set your power limits based on how capable your cooling system is. The bigger question is: Do i really need throttleStop since the red peaks are only "occasional" ?Ĭlick to expand.It is not great if a laptop thermal throttles during the TS Bench test but as long as your CPU runs reliably, some occasional thermal throttling is not the end of the world. My question is: Which setting should i use? Any more tips? Now with this setting i'm getting the absolute best temperatures (low 60s) BUT i'm getting occasional "power" warning in ThrottleStop when gaming and obviously constant "power" warning in TS bench. Setting 3: Same as setting 2 BUT i set both PL1 and PL2 to 24. Temperatures mainly in 70s and sometimes reaching 80. Good results with no warnings in limit reasons.
#BEST CINEBENCH SCORE WINDOWS#
Setting 2: Lowered turbo limits to 34, offsets both to -125, disabled PD Prochot, Speedshit EPP at 0 with windows power slider to middle, Speed shift values min 8 max 34, set Long power PL1 to 38, Short Power PL2 to 79. Setting 1: I started by lowering both the CPU and Cache offsets to -125, disabled PD Prochot, Speedshift EPP at 0 with windows power slider back to middle, set speed shift min/max value according what it showed (min 8, Max 41). This is what concerned me and made me look into ThrottleStop. When i mean by flashing is that the red peaks come and go during gameplay. When I use the balanced power settings with the slider all the way to the right (Best performance), i get temperatures around the high 70-80s BUT with constant flashing red 95+ peaks in HWMonitor. I have an MSI Ge63 Raider 8RE GHZ and GTX 1060 with hyperthreading on in BIOS. However, we should not have to wait longer to find out if both companies are planning to launch their next-gen chips later this year.I've been lurking around here for a week and been reading many threads about the best settings for 8750H and ThrottleStop. While we should take these results with a pinch of salt, it seems like Intel Raptor Lake processors would produce an impressive performance boost in comparison to their 12th Gen counterparts. Quite simply, the chip performed worse in single core tests, although this may be a sign of being an engineering sample. The Intel Core i5 13600K, which runs in both CPU-Z and Cinebench multicore tests, is back in the dust with respective scores of 10,031 (+79%) and 24,420 (+40%), owing to its higher clock speeds and increased core/thread count (via Videocardz).
The results look promising, especially considering that this chip doesn't have all of the functionality that the retail CPU will.
However, new expectations indicate that the medium-range chip may be quite robust, surpassing its 12th Gen counterpart.ĮCSM_Official has since put the processor through Cinebench R23 and CPU-Z benchmarks after getting their hands on an Intel Core i5 13600K engineering sample. The Intel Core i5 13600K may not be the most powerful Raptor Lake processor, but it might be the best gaming processor for those who don't need the extra performance that comes with more premium i7 and i9 models.
0 kommentar(er)
